Hi Lokesh,
I know about that issue, but unfortunately this is not my use case. I need to know the logical steps, the system does when determining a payment medium format for a payment.
In my case: SEPA Bank Transfer has 1st priority in the fine-tuning-activity Global settings for Payments. To my mind that means: Each time, I pay from an SEPA-participating county to another SEPA-participating county the system checks if a SEPA Bank Transfer file can be created.
In the bank's master data the payment format SEPA Credit Transfer is set. As long as I do not add ISO20022 al valid payment format in the bank's master data, the system in fact creates a SEPA Bank Transfer file.
But once I add ISO20022 as payment format in the bank's master data it creates a ISO20022 file for the same payment, allthough I did not change anything more.
My issue is:
- The payment method SEPA Credit Transfer is valid for both payment formats
- Both paymant formats are valid for the bank
Why does it create the ISO20022? What are the logical steps for determining the payment file format?
Thanks!
Best Regards
Peter